EOI from Audit firms
Emmanuel Hospital Association, GFATM Rd9 HIV-IDU Grant
Location: Aizawl, Allahabad, Bhopal, Kozhikode, Chennai, Delhi, Dimapur, Guwahati, Imphal, Kolkata, Lucknow, Mumbai, Patna and Thiruvananthapuram
Last Date: June 25, 2011
EOI from
Audit firms
Emmanuel
Hospital Association, GFATM Rd9 HIV-IDU Grant
Locations:
Aizawl, Allahabad, Bhopal, Kozhikode, Chennai, Delhi, Dimapur, Guwahati,
Imphal, Kolkata, Lucknow, Mumbai, Patna and Thiruvananthapuram.
Last Date:
June 25, 2011
The Emmanuel Hospital Association
(EHA) as a Principal Recipient under The Global Fund Round 9 India HIV
Grant invites expressions of interest, detailed organizational profile
and quotes from audit firms for quarterly financial audits as per the
under-mentioned Audit Plan, Terms of Reference and Guidelines to a
Management Letter.
A total of 31 sub-recipients of the EHA are located at
Aizawl, Allahabad, Bhopal, Kozhikode, Chennai, Delhi, Dimapur, Guwahati,
Imphal, Kolkata, Lucknow, Mumbai, Patna and Thiruvananthapuram.
An auditing firm may apply for one or more sites clearly mentioning in
the
Subject line
“Quote for Quarterly Audits at <name(s) of the place(s) from the above
list>”
and send their offers latest 2:00 pm on Saturday, 25th June
2011 addresses to the Project Director via email to
EhaGF9@gmail.com
Audit Plan
Background and scope
The Emmanuel Hospital Association (EHA) is a Principal Recipient under
The Global Fund (GFATM) Round 9 India HIV Grant. The Project Management
Unit (PMU) of the EHA is mandated under Article 13 of the Standard Terms
and Conditions of the Grant Agreement to conduct external audits at the
Principal Recipient (PR) and Sub Recipient (SR) levels. Audits of PR and
the SR’s programme financial statements are the mandate and fiduciary
framework of the GFATM. The GFATM does not require a consolidated
financial statement of the PR and their SRs receipts and expenditures for
audit purposes.
These audits are important parts of the assurance process regarding
proper use of GFATM funds and provide the basis for decision-making on
the disbursement of funds and the renewal of grants within the framework
of GFATM performance-based funding principles. The audits are to provide
the GFATM with reasonable assurance that disbursed funds were used for
the intended purposes in accordance with the grant agreement, the
approved budget and the performance framework.
As per the Grant agreement, it is essential that an audit mechanism be
developed to support the reports submitted by the Principal Recipient and
Sub-recipients to The Global Fund.
The PMU follows a transparent process to select auditors. The selection
process will be based on competitive bidding by audit firms. The PMU will
identify independent auditors at regional levels, to facilitate easy
access and proximity to SRs for better coordination and follow up in a
cost efficient manner.
The PMU has identified the following criteria’s that will be applied
during the selection process of the auditors:
-
The audit firm should have over 10 years of experience in carrying out
audits
-
The firm should have at least 3-5 years experience in handling NGO
health care or hospital audits
-
Experience in donor audit will be desirable
-
The firm must be in close proximity to the Sub- recipient
-
The human resource capacity employed in the firm
The PMU will advertize and request for proposals based on the Term of
Reference.
The PMU will constitute a committee comprising of the Executive Director,
Partnership Projects Director & Finance Director of the EHA and, Project
Director & Finance Manager of the PMU to review the proposals and select
the audit firm(s).
The PMU plans to carry out audits at the end of every quarter at the SR
level.
The PMU will agree on the audit fee depending on the scope and
geographical coverage of work assigned to each auditor. The audit fee
will include travel cost for the Auditor to visit the field of operation.
Due Date:
The Auditors will be required to submit the audit report within ten (10)
days from the date of start of audit.
Review of Audited Financial Statements:
The Finance Manager at the PMU will review the audited financial
statements, audit opinion and the management letter within fifteen (15)
days after receipt from the auditors and submit to the Management the
findings.
The Management will review the audit results and flag critical issues
that need to be addressed as part of the management action plan and
communicate these to the PMU.
The PMU will follow up on any audit issues arising at the SR level.
Through periodic visits and constant monitoring the PMU will ensure that
audit recommendations are implemented. The PMU Finance Manager will
follow up on the audit issues at the PMU level.
Deficiencies in internal control, if highlighted in the audit report,
could have impact on the future fund disbursements.
Terms of Reference
Accounting Standards
Under this grant both the PR and its SRs will follow cash based
accounting system. This will be in accordance with the Indian
Accounting Standards.
Auditor
Independence and Qualification
The auditor must be completely impartial and independent from all aspects
of management or financial interests in the entity being audited or those
of its implementing/supervising agency or directly related entities. The
auditor should not, during the period covered by the audit nor during the
undertaking of the audit, be employed by, serve as director for, or have
any financial or close business relationships with any senior participant
in the management of the entity.
The auditor must demonstrate appropriate professional qualifications and
suitable experience with Indian Auditing standards, including experience
in auditing the accounts of entities comparable in size and complexity to
the entity being audited.
The Curriculum Vitae (CVs) of the auditor(s) who will be responsible for
signing the opinion, together with the CVs of managers, supervisors and
key personnel proposed to be part of the audit team must be made
available. The senior partner should have minimum 10 years experience in
handling audits of NGOs/Hospitals. The auditor should be aware of and
comply with the Global Fund Code of Conduct for suppliers. Please
refer the ‘Code of conduct for suppliers’ on the GFATM website:
<
http://www.theglobalfund.org/documents/corporate/Corporate_CodeOfConductForSuppliers_Policy_en.pdf >.
Audit
Methodology, Quality Control and Documentation
The Auditor must make a preliminary risk assessment, which will be
followed by a planning and testing stage. The audit should be done as per
audit standards in India.
To ensure quality audit there should be a statement of professional
ethics. The auditors conducting the audit should have proper skills and
be competent to carry out the audit in a professional manner. Sufficient
direction, supervision and review of work at all levels should be carried
out in order to provide reasonable assurance that the work performed
meets appropriate standards of quality. Whenever necessary, consultation
within or outside the firm should occur with those who have appropriate
expertise. The continued adequacy and operational effectiveness of
quality control policies and procedures be monitored. These need to be in
compliance with Indian audit standards.
The auditor must also ensure all procurements at the SR levels are
consistent with the Quality Assurance Policy of The Global Fund. Any
deviations should be documented. There must be well-defined timelines,
methodologies and documentation procedures for all evidence gathered. The
major components of audit documentation are the record of audit
procedures performed, relevant audit evidence obtained and the
conclusions the auditor reached.
Audit
Scope
1. The quarterly audits are intended for the SR’s
2. The audits would be carried out in accordance to the Indian Accounting
Standards (for book-keeping) and Indian Audit & Assurance Standards (for
auditing)
3. The audit period covered would include the current reporting period
4. Sufficient audit evidence is gathered to substantiate in all material
respects the accuracy of financial statements
5. A sufficient sample of disbursements be used for audit to determine
whether funds disbursed through SOE’s were used for the purpose defined
by the funding agreement
6. The designated bank account used for Global Fund moneys be verified
with records to determine cash in the bank account
The selected auditors will be provided the unit-wise breakdown of the
quarterly program budget for first two years. The auditor is required to
provide an Audit Report. The report should state if the audit was not in
conformity with any of the above and indicate the alternative standards
and procedures followed. Please refer the cover letter for additional
requirements regarding location and number of sites to be covered.
Audit
opinion
1. The period covered by the opinion
2. That bookkeeping was as per Indian accounting standards and indicates
the effect of any deviations from those standards
3. That Indian audit and assurance standards were followed and complied
with in all material respects
4. Whether the financial statements and supporting schedules fairly
present the cash receipts and expenditure for the program and the funds
were used for the purposes defined by the funding agreement
Reports
The auditor would need to provide to the PR the financial statements and
a management letter at the end of each audit.
The financial statements include the following components:
i. Statement of Income & Expenditure
ii. Statement of Financial Position (Balance Sheet)
iii. Statement of Cash Flows
iv. Notes to the financial statements
The Management Letter should at least include:
• An assessment of the program's internal control system with equal
emphasis on (i) the effectiveness of the system in providing the
programme management with useful and timely information for the proper
management of the programme and (ii) the general effectiveness of the
internal control system in protecting the assets and resources of the
programme.
• A description of any specific internal control weaknesses noted in the
financial management of the programme and the audit procedures followed
to address or compensate for the weaknesses. Recommendations to
resolve/eliminate the internal control weaknesses noted should be
included.
Access to
Information
All financial records of PR (PMU) and SR’s are located at the respective
offices usually with the finance and administration staff. The PMU and
SR’s use TALLY automated accounting software for doing financial entries
and generating reports.
The auditor will have full and complete access at any time to all records
and documents (including books of account, legal agreements, minutes of
committee meeting, bank records, invoices and contracts etc.) and all
employees of the entity. The auditor has a right of access to bank and
depositories, consultants, contractors and other persons or firms engaged
by the program management.
Audit
Follow up
The auditor must ensure during subsequent audits that the issues arising
out of previous audits both at the PR (PMU) and SR levels have been
addressed. They should verify compliance and ensure that audit
recommendations have been implemented. Any pending issues need proper
justification.
Guidelines to a Management Letter
STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
(It
must clearly be noted on the face of the Management Letter that it is a
confidential document and must be treated as such, in accordance with
Global Fund’s Policy on documents)
(The Management Letter should state that the auditor acknowledges and
agrees that the Management Letter shall be shared with the Global fund on
a confidential basis. The audience of the letter, however, is the
PR/Sub-recipient)
(Name of SR) - MANAGEMENT LETTER FOR THE AUDIT OF FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED ……..(Insert year end date)
(Background information is provided on the applicable auditing
framework that was employed in auditing the Financial Statements, for
which there is this management letter)
(The purpose of the financial statement audit should be stated here
which is the expression of an opinion on the Financial Statements. Also,
a brief description of the methodology used in carrying out the audit as
regards the use of testing as the basis for examining evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures contained in the Financial Statements, inter-alia.)
(An explanation of the purpose of the management letter should be
provided in terms of the value-added in its provision to management for
the improvement of systems and processes for the organisation, thereby
aiding the achievement of broader organisational goals)
(A description of system of grading of the management letter issues or
findings should be provided in order that the PR is able to better
prioritise implementation of recommendations emanating from findings.
The following system of grading is recommended:
Grade 1
findings are those which are particularly significant and the involvement
of management may be required for their resolution. These are high level
issues which impact seriously on the achievement of overall grant goals
Grade II
findings are those that may have significant impact on the control
environment. Here control environment looks at risk factors derived from
management’s attitude to risk as regards operational activities
within the PR/Sub-recipient organisation.
Grade III
findings are those which are less significant than Grade 1 and II but
nevertheless merit attention.
1.0
(Brief heading for finding)
(Grade 1, 2 or 3 as is applicable)
{Where there is a criteria (or criterion as the case may be) which is
the object of non-compliance by the PR/Sub-recipient, then this must be
stated or quoted where applicable. A criterion is defined as any law,
policy, regulation or framework that an audited entity has to comply with
in carrying out its activities. A deviation or complete non-compliance of
it would trigger a finding. In some instances, criteria would not be
present hence it would not be necessary to state it here}
1.1 FINDING
{The condition or issue presently obtaining which could have been as a
result of non-compliance of criteria is stated here fully. This must be
consistent with the grading level indicated above. Where possible, the
reason(s)/rationale for the non-compliance to the criteria or factors
responsible for the finding issue should be stated in a separate
paragraph or section under FINDING}
1.2 IMPLICATION
{The effect of the finding both from a financial and non-financial
perspective should be clearly stated here as this will provide better
insights to the PR/Sub-recipient entity in formulating a robust
management response and action plan for implementation of
recommendations.}
1.3 RECOMMENDATION
{Practical recommendations relevant to the findings stated in 1.1 above
should be put in this category. Recommendations should be capable of
eliminating or reducing the effects identified in 1.2 above (to an
acceptable level) such that there will be no negative material impact on
grant implementation upon its initiation by PR/SR management}
1.4 BENEFITS
{The advantages of implementing the recommendations stated in 1.3 above
should be highlighted here from a financial and non-financial
perspective. The use of financial data in terms of for example, cost
savings, should be stated here}
1.5 MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSE
{PRs/Sub-recipients are required to unequivocally state the extent to
which they agree or disagree with the finding indicated above. This
should extend further to whether they agree or disagree with all the
other elements to the management letter (i.e. 1.2 to 1.4). These should
include reasons for the agreement or disagreement.
Finally, all Management Letters must contain a “Matters arising from
previous audits” section in tabular form that will serve as a
tracking tool in determining the status of implementation of
recommendations:
Matters arising from previous audits |
Issue (i.e. the finding identified) |
Recommendations |
Status of Implementation |
Comments |
(The period covering the audit is stated here; it should follow
chronologically from one year to the next) |
(The findings of previous audits are entered here. The findings
should be quoted verbatim or reproduced from the relevant management
letter) |
(The recommendations related to the findings from the previous
column are entered here quoting verbatim from the relevant management
letter) |
(The state of implementation is entered here via the following
key: Y (Yes)– showing full implementation of recommendations. N (No)
- showing that the recommendation remains to be implemented and P
(Partial) – showing that implementation has commenced but is yet to
be completed |
(For N and P categories, an indication of the audit period from
when the finding and recommendation was first identified should be
stated, inter-alia) |
|