Terms of Reference: External Evaluation of the Integrated programme for the urban poor living in slums and settlement
GOAL India
Location: Kolkata and Mahestala Municipalities
Last Date: October 25, 2010
Email: goal@goalindia.org (Reference:
DevNetJobsIndia.org)
Terms of Reference: External Evaluation of the
Integrated programme for the urban poor living in slums and settlements
by GOAL India.
External Evaluation
Terms of Reference, October 2010
GOAL
is an international humanitarian organization dedicated to alleviating
the suffering the poorest of the poor. GOAL in India supports the overall
mission of the organization by implementing poverty alleviation
programmes in West Bengal , through partnerships with national NGOs with
the objective of building the capacities of the poorest of the poor
towards self sustenance and self determination, while simultaneously
reducing their vulnerability to crises, neglect, abuse and exploitation.
GOAL India is committed to eradication of poverty in all forms: social,
economic, cultural, political etc and has strategized investment in area
based integrated programmes to address the multiple needs of individuals,
households and communities in underdeveloped urban and rural areas of
West Bengal.
Under the framework of the
Country Strategic Plan (2007-2011) , GOAL India has been implementing
the Integrated Programme for the urban poor living in slums and
settlements, through two separate projects one for six settlements in the
Kolkata and Mahestala Municipalities and the other with two settlements
in the Howrah Municipality, West Bengal. Refer Annexure I for
project summary.
The Country Strategic Plan
(2007-2011), makes a commitment to an evaluation which will focus on “the
poverty impacts of the CSP 2007-2011” . To maximise the utility of such
an evaluation, this evaluation needs to be carried out before the end of
the current plan / programme period 2007-2011.
The Primary audience for the
evaluation will be the GOAL India Management team, while the secondary
audience will include the GOAL India national partner organizations, GOAL
HQ and Irish Aid, other audiences will include local stakeholders.
The purpose of this
evaluation is to provide GOAL India with an independent, evidence –based
assessment of how the programme strategies adopted by GOAL India for the
Integrated Programme for the urban poor living in slums and settlements
has contributed to reducing the poverty and vulnerability of targeted
communities . The assessment will help inform the development of a
performance based GOAL India support strategy for the development of
poverty alleviation programme in India beyond 2011 and contribute to how
GOAL India partners might strengthen their programming.
The evaluation will focus on
the contribution that the Integrated Programme for the urban poor living
in slums and settlements has made to poverty reduction and what the
stakeholders ( partners and communities) have achieved with the support
provided by GOAL India. The overarching question for the evaluation will
thus be :
“To what extent have the
projects under the Integrated Programme for the urban poor in slums and
settlements contributed to reducing poverty and vulnerability”?
In respect to this question,
the evaluation will provide an assessment based upon outcomes and
achievements of the Integrated programme. The assessment will examine in
detail qualitative and quantitative evidence from a substantive and
representative sample of the settlements in Kolkata, Mahestala and Howrah
Municipalities. In assessing performance, the evaluators will take
cognisance of the theory of change, results’ framework and strategy for
poverty reduction as stated in the GOAL India CSP 2007-2011.
GOAL India
recommends that the evaluation will use the OCED-DAC evaluation criteria
of relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability.
As appropriate , assessments against these criteria will be backed by
evidence of outcomes at the immediate and/or intermediate objective
levels. Assessments will refer to the annual proposals of the two
projects under the Integrated Programme for the urban poor living in
slums and settlements, West Bengal.
Key questions for
consideration include:
Relevance
1. To what extent are the
projects under the Integrated Programme for the urban poor living in
slums and settlements a relevant response to the multi-dimensional
aspects of poverty and vulnerability ?.
Effectiveness:
2. To what extent have the
projects under the Integrated Programme for the urban poor living in
slums and settlements been effective ( immediate and intermediate outcome
levels) in helping reduce poverty and vulnerability through supporting
responses to crises, strengthening the development of communities and
improving access to resources and services?
3. To what extent have the
projects under the Integrated Programme for the urban poor living in
slums and settlements, informed by situational analysis and policies ,
focus on the achievement of results, accountability and the measurement
of longer term impacts?
Efficiency:
4. To what extent have the
projects in the Integrated Programme for the urban poor living in slums
and settlements, involved the targeted communities and local
stakeholders at the ward, and municipal level thereby helping strengthen
programme participation and ownership in the delivery of poverty and
vulnerability focussed programme?.
5. What factors have enabled
the projects under the Integrated Programme for the urban poor living in
slums and settlements, to deliver efficiently on the strategic
objectives as elaborated in the project proposals ?.
6. To what extent have the
projects under the Integrated Programme for the urban poor living in
slums and settlements been efficiently managed by GOAL India and its
partners?
Sustainability:
7. Is there any evidence that
the benefits resulting from the GOAL India funding support are likely to
be sustained?
This document will not
clarify exhaustively the methodology to be undertaken by a consultant(s)
in carrying out this evaluation; it will be the responsibility of each
interested consultant to identify how s/he/they would propose to
undertake the assignment and bench mark it against internationally
recognised best practice.
The following are to be borne
in mind however:
§
The overall objective of the evaluation framework is
to examine the extent to which the Integrated Programme for the urban
poor living in slums and settlements has been able to promote
improvements specifically related to coverage of interventions and
quality of outcome.
Adhering to the logic
model/ results based management approach , the results of the assessment
shall not only be used to flag what the initiative has achieved but also
shall provide diagnostic insights into the processes and comment on the
efficiencies.
§
In consonance with the implementation design, a
cross
sectional evaluation
design is proposed.
§
wherein both quantitative and qualitative components are used to assess
the results and outcomes.
§
The Mix design will be
followed for the quantitative component and quantitative findings will be
substantiated with the qualitative findings to assess the overall
impacts. Also, to make the design more robust it is proposed to have the
comparison group ( if feasible) during the
assessment so that the impact can be attributed to the project.
§
The key objective of the
assessment will be to measure and compare changes in key project
indicators. To measure changes, which could have occurred due to project
interventions, sample size should be statistically adequate to identify
and measure those changes.
§
To make the evaluation
effective, the output should necessarily present a synthesis of the
“What (& why) is happening”, “What (& why) had happened” and “What (&
why) can happen” i.e. Present, Past and Future.
§
There is significant prior
documentation pertaining to the programme, in the form of proposals,
monitoring reports etc. All of this documentation will be made available
to the consultants for reference.
§
Fieldwork will be required to
facilitate the consultant(s) to arrive at a conclusion pertaining to each
of the matters outline above. Staff members of GOAL India and of Partner
organizations will be readily available to offer views and ensure
efficient implementation of the evaluation fieldwork.
§
The assessment will employ
participatory tools and skills to facilitate discussions.
The
outputs of this evaluation process will be;
1)
A detailed report that
outlines progress made in relation to set objectives, including the
findings, analysis, key lessons and recommendations. The report will also
outline key challenges and emerging opportunities for GOAL India and the
respective GOAL India partners. The findings will be supported by
quantitative and qualitative evidence related to outcomes.
2)
Provide specific
recommendations on the future direction of the Integrated Programme for
the urban poor living in slums and settlements, with specific reference
to the latest best practice.
3)
Recommendation of appropriate
methodologies and indicators for measuring the impact of the Integrated
Programme for the urban poor living in slums and settlements, as well as
a review of current methodologies and indicators.
The report will be expected
to include clear justifications for the choices and recommendations proposed. These
should include short term and long term recommendations.
The consultant(s) will be
expected to formally present a draft report to GOAL India within two
weeks of concluding the evaluation fieldwork. The presentation
should highlight major findings and observations and core
recommendations. The formal presentation will afford GOAL India, the
opportunity to comment on the evaluation findings and suggest final
amendments.
Subsequently, a final report
will be expected from the consultant(s) within one week of the
presentation/ receipt of feedback from GOAL India on the draft report.
It
is envisaged that the entire process, including fieldwork, documentation
and presentation of evaluation findings will be completed in not longer
than 40 days.
The evaluation is planned to
commence on the 1st week of November, 2010 and a report
submitted by 10th of December, 2010.
7. PROPOSAL
DOCUMENTS TO BE SUBMITTED:
All
interested consultants are requested to submit a document tendering for
this assignment. Each tender should provide detail on the following:
§
The consultant’s
understanding of the TOR
§
Proposed methodology to be
adopted in achieving TOR
§
Time frame for completion of
task
§
Proposed team for the
assignment with their CVs.
§
Non-financial resources
required (e.g. transport, personnel time, administrative arrangements,
etc.)
§
Preferred payment schedule.
§
Two references (One of your
own choice and the other from your last client/employer).
§
Proposed budget; including an
overall quotation in Indian Rupees
for all the services to be provided and must itemize the following:
§
An all
inclusive day rate for (professional and administrative)
§
An
amount for per diems (daily subsistence allowance) if applicable.
§
Any
other cost indicating the nature of such costs.
§
Summary
of the total costs for the services proposed.
Please note that , costs for proposal preparation and of
negotiating a contract, including travel cannot be reimbursed as a direct
cost of the assignment.
The detailed proposal will be sent to GOAL India
by the 25th
of October,2010 either through e-mail at
goal@goalindia.org with subject line marked as “ GI
Integrated
Programme for the urban poor living in slums and settlements,
–Evaluation
2010 – Proposal” or through post , addressed to “The
Administrator” , GOAL India , 39- Hindustan Park, Kolkata -700029. Please
inscribe on the outside of the envelope in bold “GI
Integrated Programme for the urban poor living in slums and
settlements,
–Evaluation 2010 – Proposal”
8. Proposal
Evaluation and appraisal
The proposal
will be evaluated based on the following criteria
§
Known reliability
in delivery of timely and quality services
§
Suitability of
experience, field specific and thematic
§
Suitability of
qualifications
§
Demonstrated
understanding of the evaluation proposed
§
Cost.
Annexure I
Summary of the projects under
the Integrated
Programme for the urban poor
living in slums and settlements.
Integrated programme for the
Urban Poor in Kolkata & Mahestala Municipalities 2007-2011).
–
The area based integrated programme is being implemented for the
approximately 2,200 households in six settlements of Kolkata and
Mahestala Municipalities. RIGHT TRACK is GOAL India’s
implementing partner for the programme. The programme prioritizes the
Health, Education & Livelihoods needs of the target population.
Integrated programme for the
Urban Poor in Howrah Municipality( 2009-2011).
– The three year
area based integrated programme is being implemented for the
approximately 325 households in two settlements of Tikiapara , Howrah
Municipality. KODALIPARA DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY ( KDS ) is GOAL
India’s implementing partner for the programme. The programme prioritizes
the Health, Education & Livelihoods needs of the target population.
Annexure II
OUTCOMES TO BE MEASURED
AT THE END OF 2011.
-
Improved education status of children in the age group of 6 to 14
in terms of participation, retention and learning achievement.
|
-
Percentage of households in which all children under 14, are
attending school. [CGI 6.1]
-
Percentage of households with all female children ( 6- 14 ) are
attending school [CGI 6.2]
|
§
Improved health
status of families in terms of reduced morbidity and improvement in
health seeking behaviour.
|
-
%
of HHs who perceive an improvement in population health status
since the same time last year. [CGI 1.1]
-
Main factor that has contributed to perceived change in household
health status. [CGI 1.2]
|
§
Improved health
status of mother and children through accessing government health
entitlement.
|
-
Percentage of children aged 6-59 months who are less than 3 z
scores, weight for age (WFA)-underweight. [CGI 2.1]
-
The
proportion of morbidity in children U5 attributed to a specific
disease or cause. [CGI 7.2]
-
Percentage of population with knowledge of at least two ways of
prevention of HIV [CGI 4.1]
-
Percentage of population who indicate that they would
support/accept community member who was living with HIV. [CGI
4.2]
|
-
Increased Family earnings leading to improved livelihoods status
|
-
Percentage of households in community who can indicate more than
one source of cash income. [CGI 5.2]
|
|